![]() |
|||
| INSIGHTS NEWSLETTERS Fall 2004, Vol. 17, No 2 Spring 2004, Vol. 17, No.1 Spring 2003, Vol. 16, No. 1 April 2002, Vol. 15, No. 1 Nov 2001, Vol. 14, No. 2 April 2001, Vol. 14, No. 1 May 2000, Vol 13, Num 1 Oct 1999, Vol 12, Num 2 May 1999, Vol 12, Num 1 Nov 1998, Vol 11, Num 2 Jan 1998, Vol 11, Num 1 Feb 1997, Vol 10, Num 1 Sept 1996, Vol 9, Num 2 August 1995, Vol 8, Num 2 Sept 1993, Vol 6, Num 2 October 1990, Vol 4, Num 2 WELCOME TO PI Info About PI Why a Prosthodontist? Meet Our Doctors Research Programs What's New At PI? Free Video Offer DENTAL TREATMENT Dental Implants Treatment Options Prosthesis Types Bone Grafting Dental Implants & Congenital Deformities Bad Breath Orthodontic Treatment Combined with Procera Crowns HEALTH-ISSUES AND DENTISTRY Bone Loss and Aging Heart Illness & Dentistry Snoring/Sleep Apnea Osteoporosis Cancer Information Drugs and Dentistry Smoking & Implants Other Medical |
Volume 14, Number 2 -- November 2001
TEETH IN A DAYTM in the Upper Jaw TJ Balshi and GJ Wolfinger The Surgical Procedure A board certified anesthesiologist provided nasal intubation for general anesthesia. Local anesthetics were then delivered and the remaining maxillary teeth were removed. The same procedure was completed in the mandibular posterior where multiple teeth were removed. After all visible pathology was removed from the surgical sites, the area was irrigated with an antibiotic solution. The patient was then re-draped in the traditional sterile protocol for implant placement. The maxillary left area was opened to obtain visibility for the placement of the zygoma implant. This follows the traditional zygoma protocol. A 45 mm long zygoma implant was placed in the area tooth #14. Immediately following the placement of maxillary implants, all of the newly placed implants in the anterior and left side received appropriate abutments. The three original maxillary implants that were placed in 1992 had the abutments changed to 1 mm EsthetiCone abutments to enable a more esthetically pleasing restoration. Two implants in the maxillary right posterior had cover screws placed and were left submerged submucosally in the traditional 2-stage protocol. The prosthetic reconstruction, which had been fabricated in the laboratory at the newly restored occlusal vertical dimension, was then attached to all of the maxillary abutments except the last two on the right side using the conversion prosthesis technique. The maxillary teeth were set into the precise special position and the conversion prosthesis was then removed from the mouth. Clinical laboratory technician team members refined this prosthesis and added additional reinforcing acrylic throughout the lingual and cervical areas to provide improved esthetics. This custom-made conversion prosthesis then becomes the TEETH IN A DAYTM restoration. While the maxillary prosthesis was refined in the laboratory, the mandibular implants were surgically placed. Four implants were inserted into both the left and right posterior regions. Cover screws were used on all eight mandibular implants and these were left submerged in the traditional Brånemark protocol since they would not be functional for at least three months. |
||
|
More Information Home | Write Us | REQUEST INFORMATION To make an appointment for an evaluation, call: 1-800-PI-TEAM-5 All information is intended for your general knowledge only and is not a substitute for dental or medical advice or treatment for specific dental or medical conditions. You should seek prompt dental and medical care for any specific health issues. See disclaimer. Copyright 2008 Pi Dental Center (Prosthodontics Intermedica). |
|||